POST#6 SONY DON`T KNOW BUSINESS LAW

IF THE OWNER OF A COMPANY DIES, HIS  COMPANY DIES TOO....UNLESS THE IMMEDIATE FAMILY OF THE  DECEDENT WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE THE BUSINESS ...HE  OR SHE WILL MAKE A LEGAL MOVE LIKE TO  TRANSFER OF AUTHORITY IN THE TRANSITION PERIOD...REPLACED BY THE SUCCESSOR(HEIRS) OF THE DECEDENT.....THE SUCCESSOR  HAVE 2 OPTIONS TO CONTINUE OR WITHDRAW THE SHARES OF STOCKS  IN COMPANY IF THE DECEDENT HAVE BUSINESS PARTNERS LIKE IN MICHAEL`S CASE....THE JACKSON FAMILY WERE NOT CONSULTED ON THE MATTER IF THEY WILL CONTINUE THE PARTNERSHIP OR WITHDRAW THE  SHARES OF STOCKS MICHAEL INVESTED ON THE PARTNERSHIP.....ACTUALLY  AS FAR AS I KNOW  THERE WILL BE SUBMISSION OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES  ON THE PROPERTY OF MICHAEL IN SONY/ATV (MICHAEL JACKSON) MUSIC PUBLISHING BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP WITH SONY.......THIS IS THE FIRST STEP SO THAT THE FAMILY CAN ASSESS THE STATUS OF THE PROPERTY OF MICHAEL IN  THE BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP......I`M SURE THIS IS NOT DONE BECAUSE THEY SONY INSISTED THE  FAKE LAST WILL......SO UPTO NOW THE STATUS OF MICHAEL`S INVESTMENTS IN THE BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP WITH SONY IS CONFUSING AND BLURRED.....THE FIRST PROBLEM OF THE FAMILY IS THE  MURDER CHANGE TO HOMICIDE TO DEVIATE THE INVESTIGATION....BECAUSE IN MURDER CASE, INVESTIGATION WILL START ON  QUESTIONING  ALL THE 
PEOPLE THAT THE DECEDENT HAD A DISPUTE (EVEN 10 YEARS BEFORE HE WAS KILLED).....THE SECOND PROBLEM IS  HOW TO CLAIM THE SHARES OF STOCKS OF MICHAEL IN THAT PARTNERSHIP FOR THE CUSTODY OF LEGAL HEIRS....THIS IS ALSO THE REASON  WHY MICHAEL WILL NEVER MAKE A LAST WILL BECAUSE HE WANTS TO BE OUT OF SONY SHADOWS.....